The Northern Gateway pipeline project will pose significant environmental risks, particularly regarding potential oil spills and increased greenhouse gas emissions. The pipeline would have crossed numerous rivers and streams, potentially harming salmon habitats and other aquatic ecosystems. The increased tanker traffic to transport the oil would have also raised the risk of marine spills and disturbances to coastal environments, including the Great Bear Rainforest.   We want to protect all the watersheds, rivers, streams and wildlife habitats along the proposed pipeline route and salmon, oysters, shrimp, sable fish, etc. in BC's coastal waters. We want future generations to marvel at Orcas, Grey and Humpback whales, Sea Lions, Sea Otters, Sea Bird. We want clean beaches and a pristine Great Bear Rainforest & Sea and Haida Gwaii. 

GardaWorld — a Canadian-based “private security company” — has million-dollar contracts to execute Trump's racist and inhumane immigration regime, which kidnaps people, tears families apart, and denies people due process. This includes staffing the infamous ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) facility "Alligator Alcatraz", which has been described as an "oversized kennel" where people are held without cause, don't see sunlight, and are denied basic rights. The Canadian government, meanwhile, is also quietly awarding federal contracts to GardaWorld — and has refused to commit to ending those contracts despite knowing the company’s role in these abuses. The Code of Ethics of GardaWorld states that the company: "GardaWorld fully supports the principles enshrined in the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights." And yet: • ICE and the U.S. government are currently being sued for a policy which allows ICE agents to arrest people for showing up to court and prevent them from pursuing their immigration cases • Reports from more than two dozen facilities across 16 states from 2017 to 2019, found "negligent" medical care (including mental health care), "unsafe and filthy" conditions, racist abuse of detainees, inappropriate pepper-spraying of mentally ill detainees and other problems that, in some cases, contributed to detainee deaths. And reports from 2017-2021 show the same patterns. • ICE detention lacks basic due process protections found in criminal detention • ICE and immigration detention are being used to deter use of First Amendment-protected free speech This is Maple-washing at its worst. A company using its Canadian identity and reputation to legitimize its work while contributing to a brutal system of detention and deportation. And yet, the Canadian government continues doing business with GardaWorld. That's OUR money the Canadian government is using through the public purse to fund and legitimize these abuses. Canada must take a stand. No more contracts. No more complicity. Sign the petition now to demand the Canadian Government end contracts with GardaWorld. 

The climate crisis is expensive. In just a few hours during July 2024, heavy rainfall in Toronto caused over $940 million in insured damages. A month later in August, a 20-minute hailstorm in the Calgary area led to $3.25 billion in insured losses with 130,000 claims filed in a single day. When we go beyond just looking at the insured losses and account for the cost of these extreme weather events on healthcare, businesses, and social factors, the costs are even greater. For example, Swiss Re estimates that the financial impact of the Fort McMurray wildfires cost around $8.9 billion or 5.2 times greater than insured losses of $1.7 billion. What is the largest contributor to this problem? Fossil fuels. Fossil fuels – coal, oil, and gas – are by far the largest contributor to climate change, accounting for over 75% of global green house gas emissions and nearly 90% of all carbon dioxide emissions. As greenhouse gas emissions blanket the Earth, they trap the sun’s heat. This leads to global warming and climate change. Heat-pumps and Green Building Standards are an important part of the energy transition. Local governments who are closest to the ground must be treated as equal partners in this as they are the ones closest to the ground, understand the needs of the community, and engage in deliberative processes.

Shambhalas last minute decision to go cashless impacts the community for a myriad of reasons.  The most egregious of which is changing the terms under which we bought tickets to this event. It limits our accessibility to essential goods and services ie; Food / Beverages / Ice etc ...  It also limits vendors livelihoods by forcing them to take one less form of payment and giving them little time to prepare for a sudden change. Shambhala music festival has offered little to no information about security measure for they're RFD bracelets and has not answered questions about refunding remaining funds on said pre-loaded bracelet making this a blatant money grab.  With Shambhalas recent infractions / fines from the BC Ministry of Transportation as well as WORKSAFEBC it is well within reason to assume that the "better business bureau" and "ombudsman" would be willing to look into this forced change.  The links to both of which are below.  https://bcombudsperson.ca/complaints/ https://www.bbb.org/file-a-complaint

This shamelessly greenwashed environmental and fiscal misadventure is an absolutely needless waste of taxpayer dollars when a far less costly and environmentally sustainable means of providing a more efficient and upgradable electrical storage facility can be done faster with a battery park on Saugeen/Ojibway land beside the Bruce Nuclear Power Plant in Tiverton Ontario.   Having to run a new high voltage transmission corridor from Bruce Nuclear Power plant to run pumps in Meaford is a flagrant abuse of funds and the environment when a battery park near the power source can be built and service our struggling electrical grid far sooner and for a fraction of the cost. 

The recent article in the globe and mail indicated that members of the NDP leadership are looking to require $150,000 entry fee and $1.5 million spending limit for the upcoming NDP leadership race. This would require prospective NDP leaders to spend their time extracting more money from NDP members. There is no evidence this will improve the quality of the leader chosen or provide real value to NDP members. It will significantly narrow the field of prospects to choose from. When a leadership race is centered on earning votes rather than fundraising, the focus shifts to the quality of ideas, vision, and genuine connection with the public. When fundraising ability becomes the main metric, candidates are often judged by their access to wealth and influential networks rather than their competence or responsiveness to the needs of everyday citizens. This approach risks sidelining talented leaders who might not have the same financial backing but possess the moral authority, innovative thinking, and grassroots appeal necessary to drive meaningful change. Choosing leaders based on votes ensures that the race reflects the true will of the people, emphasizing policy substance and community trust over the sway of dollars.  Furthermore, making the leadership race about vote-earning rather than fundraising reinforces the democratic principles upon which the NDP is founded. A campaign that prioritizes genuine voter support over financial prowess helps purge the undue influence of big-money interests, paving the way for a leadership that is more attuned to the concerns and aspirations of its members. This approach not only elevates honest, effective leadership but also restores public confidence in a process that should be a contest of ideas and commitment to progress. It positions the party to better serve its constituents, signaling a renewed dedication to meaningful change over monetary influence. I propose an alternative: using centralized, party-funded platforms to drive our fundraising efforts. Rather than evaluating candidates solely on their individual fundraising prowess, we can assess their ability to mobilize and manage our party’s resources. This model levels the playing field, encouraging broader participation, especially from candidates who may not have deep pre-existing donor networks, while ensuring that any surplus funds are retained within the party for future needs. By transforming the leadership race into a collective fundraising event, we not only simplify the financial landscape but also strengthen our party's unity and resource base. This change would allow us to focus on finding the best leader to deliver results while optimizing our financial resources for long-term success. Stand for a NDP leader who can win hearts, not wallets - Sign now to ensure our NDP leadership race is defined by earned votes—not by the power of fundraising! 

In Canada, many assume help is available to everyone in need — but that simply isn't true. Right now, countless disabled people, single adults, and those without children are being denied access to food supports because we don’t “qualify.” We are told: • “Go to a food bank” (but many of us can’t — due to agoraphobia, PTSD, physical disabilities, or lack of transport). • “Get help from family” (many of us don’t have that support). • “Apply for programs” (we do — and we’re rejected, because we’re single or don’t have children). This is systemic neglect. And it’s leading to suffering, starvation, and suicidal desperation. We are human beings who deserve to eat, to be seen, and to be helped. We are: • Seniors living alone on fixed incomes • People with invisible illnesses or trauma • Individuals with no children, but very real needs • People stuck in food deserts, too disabled or traumatized to access charity options • Survivors of violence, poverty, and illness — being left behind by our own government We call on the Canadian Government and relevant provincial departments to: 1. Create a national food assistance program that covers individuals — not just households with children. 2. Ensure accessible delivery options for people with mobility challenges, agoraphobia, or PTSD. 3. Include people with disabilities on fixed incomes — especially those receiving provincial or federal disability supports (AISH, ODSP, CPP-D, etc.). 4. Work with disabled and mentally ill people directly to co-design a program that actually works.  We are tired of being invisible.  We are tired of being punished for not having kids.  We are tired of choosing between rent and groceries. Food is a right — not a reward.

The Golden Dome purports to defend North America against incoming missiles by placing interceptors in space, but the technical challenges are enormous, the costs astronomical, and the strategic risks profound. This project has the potential to spark an arms race and potentially make a pre-emptive attack more likely. According to former Foreign Affairs Minister Lloyd Axworthy, "The proper response to another Trump-era folly is not quiet consideration or cautious diplomacy. It’s a firm, unequivocal no – just as it was in 1985." Canadian values should incline us to put additional federal dollars into global conflict resolution and emergency foreign aid rather than expend mega-billions on a potentially costly boondoggle with an unreliable partner that will make the world even more unstable and insecure. We know that true security comes from investing in housing, healthcare, education, and climate justice—not billion-dollar weapons in space. The Golden Dome is a betrayal of those priorities. Join me in demanding better — sign the petition to Prime Minister Mark Carney and say no to this reckless scheme.

The Canada Pension Plan safeguards the futures of 22 million hardworking Canadians – from teachers and nurses to tradespeople and tech workers – and retirees who’ve paid in over a lifetime. With over $714 billion of our retirement savings, it’s one of the largest investment funds in the world – and it has the power to help drive the global transition away from fossil fuels.   In 2022, our national pension manager committed to reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. But in May 2025, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) quietly abandoned that promise, putting our retirement security and climate future at risk. This is worse than a broken promise. It’s a failure of responsibility. CPPIB is legally bound to protect long-term returns without taking on undue risk. But a future shaped by 3.1°C of global warming – the path the world is currently on – threatens not just portfolio performance, but the very survival of the Canada Pension Plan itself. Working Canadians under 40 won't retire until well after 2050. They are counting on a pension fund that can withstand a future shaped by climate change – not one that fuels it. Send a message to CPPIB now. Demand they re-commit to a net-zero future and protect the financial future of every Canadian who pays into the Canada Pension Plan. For more information see our statement here.

The government is trying to address the ongoing opioid crisis through ending take-home prescribed safer supply drug programs. Those of us with lived experience, as well as family and friends, know this approach doesn’t work, in fact, it causes more harm. In our communities and peer groups, we’ve seen the positive impact of prescribed safer drug supply. We know people who’ve found stability, hope, and a way forward because of it. But lately, it feels like more and more barriers are being added—and we’re seeing the consequences.  Right now, people are being required to be witnessed by a pharmacist. Taking their medication multiple times a day might seem reasonable on paper, but in real life, it doesn’t leave room for normal things: travel, work, parenting, emergencies, or even just running late. It makes it hard—sometimes impossible—to stay on the program, even for those who are doing everything right.   It is impossible to work and go every day to be witnessed by a pharmacist for your dose. If a dose(s) is/are missed, we need to take street drugs to get through the day, derailing our progress and setting us back.  Furthermore, missed doses could negatively impact co-workers, family and friends. People who are engaging honestly in the program end up feeling shamed or stuck. There’s no room for flexibility, and it puts people in a precarious position. Despite meeting expectations—passing drug tests, showing up, following the rules—it still often isn’t enough to be trusted. We understand that every system will have people who push the limits, yet most of us are simply trying to move forward, rebuild our lives, and stay alive.  Prescribed safer drug supply is a key factor in achieving these goals. Prescribed safer drug supply is a first step, whether toward treatment, stability, or simply having the space to breathe and make different choices. It takes people out of survival mode and into a place where they can begin to imagine a different kind of life. When these programs are grounded in dignity and trust—when staff treat us like human beings, not statistics—they truly help.  We’re asking for a chance—a real one.  Prescribed safer drug supply works. It offers a path forward, and for many of us, it’s the reason we’re still here. Let’s not take this away.

Canadians are tired of our broken voting system. After Trudeau broke his promise of reforming our electoral system in 2015, apathy and cynicism towards our democracy has grown. If Canada is to weather the challenges that come our way, we must strengthen our democracy by making our voting systems more fair through proportional representation. As our new Prime Minister, Mark Carney has an opportunity to deliver on this broken promise!  Proportional representation would ensure majority governments have the support of the majority of voters. Political parties and politicians would be incentivized to work across party lines in order to enact durable policies in the interest of all Canadians.  Proportional representation would end strategic voting. Instead of voting against the candidate they dislike, Canadians would be free to make an affirmative choice for the candidate that most reflects their values.  Proportional representation would ensure all voters have meaningful representation. Conservatives in urban centres, Liberals in the West, and progressives in rural areas would finally have representatives in Parliament that reflect their values.  Proportional representation would encourage a political culture of collaboration. Instead of rewarding partisan attacks, proportional representation would elevate politicians who can unite the public and work across party lines to form policy.  Around the world, proportional representation succeeds when two or more parties negotiate and compromise to make it happen. A non-partisan, independent Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform would be a good way to provide feedback to Parliament about how to make Canada's electoral system more proportional. Tell Prime Minister Mark Carney that we need proportional representation to make every vote count! 

Read our LETTER to the BC Special Committee on Democratic and Electoral Reform.